God exists by definition

Speaking further, the Spirit of Existence is not what is caused to exist, Existence is the Spirit of what causes to exist what exists. Existence always existed. Existence that exists outside time is normally capitalized for clarity, because of this. Time is a concept that can only exist in a comparative state. The spirit creates it's own time, forms and distances since by themselves time, form, and distance do not exist spiritually because they must first come from the abstract and then appear in the concrete. In other words, they are manifested from the spirit. The universe appears to expand forever because the spirit is not restricted and does not relate to distance outside its' own created distances. Form is a manifestation of the spirit which can be seen in the spirit but not from outside the spirit as it takes place in the concrete which is outside the spirit. Even though negative spirits desire oblivion and may achieve it, oblivion could exist in an anti-state similar to the concept of black holes.  

zero and one, on and off

I sense there is a tremendous secret right under our noses, too simple, too close to existence itself to identify clearly. Computers set the world on fire, and their simple secret is the concept of on and off. It is hard to realize that these two concepts, one on and the other off, could be so simple as they are. But they are a part of a mind boggling advance, awakening and even changing our thinking in a new way we have yet to fully appreciate. Always look to the simple for the complex and start dividing.

mirrors in our memories

The complex comes from the simple,
 the simple does not come from the complex.

There is nothing new under the sun is not technically true in the concrete but it is spiritual true in the abstract. Ancient writers were smarter than any  observers today tend to give them credit for because these lookers-on tend to fall into a hubris via the fallacy of jumping categories when they compare ancient writers to ourselves today. We cloud ourselves in our more modern technical language and perspective. But our technical heavy repetition of events organizing concrete facts to tell the spirit of the story is no more accurate than theirs. It does not matter how many or how accurately concrete facts survive in recording devices, it does not change the spiritual account of what happened. If someone does not believe what happened then, they would not believe it today either. What appears in the concrete depends on what began in the abstract world of the spirit.

a spiritual objective reminder

After we possess and inanimate object or that object becomes associated in our memory with someone, with a place or with another time, it serves as a talisman which begins a mystery for our spirit. It becomes like a word representing an abstract concept, but is itself actually a sculptured reminder of that concept. When it actually becomes or is cut off from the abstract then it is in the physical world, and is an idol. Similarly the pantheist believes in that which exists rather than the existence from which it comes.

we live in a soup of faith

Proof is relative and changes with each newly added knowledge information. If a high enough standard of proof is required then further up the ladder a decision becomes almost impossible to prove anything for total certainty. Nothing can be perfectly proved, except with a closed and limited amount of facts. We can decide we have enough proof but there will never be complete proof in evidence. If a jury takes a judge's too high standard of proof too literally, chances increase for acquittal. If even eye witnesses are suspect then what chance do we have to be technically sure of anything at all? Time also clouds our emotional reactions. Chances to misspeak or mishear are countless. We must decide what we are sure about. Now we are standing on faith.

everything is theory in the final anaysis

God is Existence. This is a definition, not a theory. A theory is a theory whether we choose to believe it or not. The big bang may be quite plausible and be very logical in the extreme but in the end everything is theory no matter how much proof we can assign to it. We never have all the facts, so must make a decision based on some measure of faith. This idea makes one postulate the likelihood we are in a spiritual soup which cannot be compared, in or to, size, form, time or distance. We must remember that the concrete all came from the abstract. The seen is from the unseen just like all complications come from the simple. There are amazing events recorded in the Bible which when a scientificly directed explanation is offered seems to render some perspectives believers and some not. This too is theory.

proof is not absolute

it must be assumed from overwhelming evidence. Doubt can be introduced from almost every quarter on almost everything. When we assume proof it is a spiritual decision in the final analysis. We can never know for absolute surety. It is a very good probability, a percentage possibility. But we are using faith in our judgment in the final conclusion. When we say all things seen came from the unseen it is meant that the unseen comes from the spirit. There are many who do not relate to anything spiritual which assumes on their part that they know much more than any of us actually do know.

on slippery ground

That one Spirit that could manipulate at will gives us a lot of leeway. There must be a reason. We are learning more and more about God everyday. Only trouble is that the more we learn the more we learn there is even more to be learned than before. Only the spirit can understand the Spirit. We are forced to move forward in faith because of the overwhelming unknowns. The more we learn the more awe we experience. We admit the possibility of dimensions and even to more than we are relating to right now. Why are there those of us who can only entertain the knowledge we know while dismissing so casually all the knowledge we do not know? We admit the scientific conclusion there are unseen factors that are revealed in the seen. It takes an expansive spirit to recognize how great existence really is. And is it not odd that the more a person knows the more unsure and aware they are of what they do not know. The more a man respects his ignorance the more intelligent he is. The more he respects his intelligence the more ignorant he is. The atheist scientist stands on the latter slippery ground ignoring all the facts that he does not know.

what goes around

Ideas might be created in a committee but the execution of the idea is diluted according to the number of members in the committee. It is possible for one entity to multiply thoughts and create ideas but if that one entity can interact with another different entity then ideas are fed back and forth creating fuel for a greater constellation of ideas in each entity. However to do this the individuals in the group must learn to think as if alone inside the group noise. Since we all speak for our own benefit it is crucial that we realize our thoughts only apply to ourselves and not to others as well. Once a spirit exists it can create on its' own but carnivorous ones may want to take over those around them. They do this because they are subconsciously losing their sense of existence so they force others into a jacket of their own making that will not last. If it did all the entities of that group would become extinct. We even might call this the Robespierre Correction, because these attempts are always consumed within their own time frame.

binaray nature of the human psyche

If you divide a single subject in two you are half way toward understanding it. Duality can take us far afield, but binary being the number system used by computers, is a mirror image of our mind. This is how we perceive reality two by two. So I stretch a subject across a continuum and establish extreme points at either end. A center freezes things in amber. It does not go anywhere, it does not lead anywhere. So I step back and observe the subject in motion. The dynamic view is a glimpsing panoramic view going in and out our subconscious memories which the static view can, unintentionally or not, be led to set up an entirely different, misleading one. It is not much good for me to think of something while at the same time neglect how I think. It is first far more important how I think than even what I think, since one act leads to the other. Without the first the second is still born.